Middleton Reutlinger
General
Cases95
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
Practice Areas
Transport., E-Comm.Semicond., OpticChemical
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
08/02/24 | Exhibit to 100 Motion for Summary Judgment, Exhibit P and Exhibit Q by COMFORT REVOLUTION. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Q)(ABRAHAM, ERIC) (Entered: 08/02/2024) | |
08/02/24 | Exhibit to 100 Motion for Summary Judgment, Exhibit L(along with Exhibits M-O) by COMFORT REVOLUTION. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit M, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit O)(ABRAHAM, ERIC)NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel is advised that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.3(c)(2), a single, consolidated motion to seal shall be filed within 14 days following the completed briefing of the materials sought to be sealed, or within 14 days following the date on which the last of such materials was filed under temporary seal if the motion is resolved, unless otherwise directed by the Court. (Entered: 08/02/2024) | |
08/02/24 | MOTION for Summary Judgment by COMFORT REVOLUTION. Responses due by 8/12/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Undisputed Facts, # 2 Brief, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit H, # 11 Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit J, # 13 Exhibit K, # 14 Declaration of B. O'Reilly, # 15 Text of Proposed Order)(ABRAHAM, ERIC) (Entered: 08/02/2024) | |
05/03/23 | NOTICE of Service of Preliminary Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying Document Production by Sullivan & Cozart, Inc. (Khariton, Oleg) (Entered: 05/03/2023) | |
11/30/22 | AMENDED PAPERLESS ORDER re 21 granting Defendant's 17 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff has not filed a response to the instant motion. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Any pending motions are denied as moot. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 11/30/2022. (mja) (Entered: 11/30/2022) | |
11/30/22 | PAPERLESS ORDER granting 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Dismissal with Prejudice and Exchange It for a Dismissal Without Prejudice. On November 3, 2022, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by default as Plaintiff failed to respond to the motion. The Court granted the motion "with prejudice" as this was the relief sought in the motion. In light of Plaintiff's instant motion, the Court agrees that the dismissal should have been without prejudice. Accordingly, an amended order shall issue dismissing the case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 11/30/2022. (mja) (Entered: 11/30/2022) | |
02/22/21 | NOTICE of Other Pleading in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: # 1 Intra District Transfer Order). (MAC) (Entered: 02/22/2021) | |
01/27/21 | Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (myr) (Entered: 01/27/2021) | |
01/27/21 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,359,044 ;9,586,659. (myr) (Entered: 01/27/2021) | |
01/27/21 | Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) (Entered: 01/27/2021) |