Stoel Rives LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases250

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

stoel-rives

stoel.com

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufTransport., E-Comm.Semicond., Optic

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/16/25	Snaprays LLC v. American Tack & Hardware Co Inc 3:24-CV-01228 ( N.D. TX )	NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by C Brenton Kugler on behalf of SnapRays LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Kugler, C) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
01/17/25	Emerging Acquisitions LLC v. Leslie Wells 8:23-CV-00329 ( C.D. CA )	AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court has reviewed the parties Joint Status Report (Dkt. No. [131] ). The Court asked the parties to provide their positions regarding the need for additional claim construction in the Joint Status Report. (Dkt. No. 130 at 8.) Defendant argued that additional claim construction should not be precluded. (Dkt. No. 131 at 3.) The Court adopts the following schedule: Deadline to File Motions to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties is July 11, 2025; Deadline to Hear Motions to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties is August 15, 2025; Disclosure of an advice of counsel defense is February 20, 2025. Jury Trial is set for June 8, 2026. [See document for further details.] (san) (Entered: 01/17/2025) AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court has reviewed the parties Joint Status Report (Dkt. No. [131] ). The Court asked the parties to provide their positions regarding the need for additional claim construction in the Joint Status Report. (Dkt. No. 130 at 8.) Defendant argued that additional claim construction should not be precluded. (Dkt. No. 131 at 3.) The Court adopts the following schedule: Deadline to File Motions to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties is July 11, 2025; Deadline to Hear Motions to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties is August 15, 2025; Disclosure of an advice of counsel defense is February 20, 2025. Jury Trial is set for June 8, 2026. [See document for further details.] (san) (Entered: 01/17/2025)
01/06/25	O'Reilly Winship LLC v. Snaprays LLC 3:21-CV-02719 ( N.D. TX )	FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ordered that defendant SnapPower take nothing on its counterclaims for patent infringement and those counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered that plaintiff OWL take nothing on its tortious interference claim, and that claim is dismissed with prejudice. Court costs are taxed against SnapPower. All relief not expressly granted is denied. This is a final judgment. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 1/6/2025) (ykp) (Entered: 01/06/2025) FINAL JUDGMENT: It is ordered that defendant SnapPower take nothing on its counterclaims for patent infringement and those counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered that plaintiff OWL take nothing on its tortious interference claim, and that claim is dismissed with prejudice. Court costs are taxed against SnapPower. All relief not expressly granted is denied. This is a final judgment. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 1/6/2025) (ykp) (Entered: 01/06/2025)
01/07/25	O'Reilly Winship LLC v. Snaprays LLC 3:21-CV-02719 ( N.D. TX )	Civil Case Terminated per [74] Final Judgment. The clerk will prepare the final Report to the Patent/Trademark or Copyright Office. (ykp) (Entered: 01/07/2025)
01/03/25	Snaprays LLC v. Home Depot Inc 4:24-CV-00463 ( E.D. TX )	SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response re [27] MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by SnapRays, LLC. (Williams, Elliott) (Entered: 01/03/2025)
01/03/25	Snaprays LLC v. Home Depot Inc 4:24-CV-00463 ( E.D. TX )	SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response re [26] OPPOSED MOTION to Sever and Stay Plaintiff's Patent Infringement Claims Pending Final Resolution of The Manufacturer Lawsuit filed by SnapRays, LLC. (Williams, Elliott) (Entered: 01/03/2025)
07/26/24	Columbia Sportswear North America Inc v. Seirus Innovative Accessories 3:17-CV-01781 ( S.D. CA )	RESPONSE in Opposition re 654 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Samantha Burnside, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14)(Aldrich, Nicholas) (Entered: 07/26/2024) RESPONSE in Opposition re 654 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Samantha Burnside, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14)(Aldrich, Nicholas) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
03/05/24	Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd v. Chiaro Technology Ltd 2:23-CV-00631 ( W.D. WA )	NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jeremy E Roller on behalf of Counter Claimants Hong Kong Lute Technology Co Limited, Shenzhen Conglin e-Commerce Co Ltd, Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd, Plaintiffs Hong Kong Lute Technology Co Limited, Shenzhen Conglin e-Commerce Co Ltd, Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd, Counter Defendants Hong Kong Lute Technology Co Limited, Shenzhen Conglin e-Commerce Co Ltd, Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd. (Roller, Jeremy) (Entered: 03/05/2024) NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jeremy E Roller on behalf of Counter Claimants Hong Kong Lute Technology Co Limited, Shenzhen Conglin e-Commerce Co Ltd, Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd, Plaintiffs Hong Kong Lute Technology Co Limited, Shenzhen Conglin e-Commerce Co Ltd, Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd, Counter Defendants Hong Kong Lute Technology Co Limited, Shenzhen Conglin e-Commerce Co Ltd, Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd. (Roller, Jeremy) (Entered: 03/05/2024)
08/09/23	Bell Semiconductor LLC v. Ampere Computing LLC 3:22-CV-01435 ( D. OR )	Patent Report: This report is submitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 290, which requires the clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Commissioner, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent. Associated Cases: 3:22-cv-01280-MO, 3:22-cv-01435-MO (kms) (Entered: 08/09/2023) Patent Report: This report is submitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 290, which requires the clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Commissioner, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent. Associated Cases: 3:22-cv-01280-MO, 3:22-cv-01435-MO (kms) (Entered: 08/09/2023)
08/09/23	Bell Semiconductor LLC v. Ampere Computing LLC 3:22-CV-01280 ( D. OR )	Patent Report: This report is submitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 290, which requires the clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Commissioner, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent. Associated Cases: 3:22-cv-01280-MO, 3:22-cv-01435-MO (kms) (Entered: 08/09/2023) Patent Report: This report is submitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. section 290, which requires the clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Commissioner, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent. Associated Cases: 3:22-cv-01280-MO, 3:22-cv-01435-MO (kms) (Entered: 08/09/2023)