Higgs Fletcher Mack
General
Cases18
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
Practice Areas
BiotechMech Eng, ManufDesign
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 10/10/24 | NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit as to [67] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment by DS Advanced Enterprises, Ltd.. ( Filing fee $ 605 receipt number ACASDC-19257875.)** Certified Public Docket, Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit, and Order emailed to the Federal Circuit; acknowledgment of Receipt Email received. ** (Cummins, Patrick) (mjw). (Entered: 10/10/2024) | |
| 05/31/22 | Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler assigned to transfer case from Middle District of Pennsylvania. (no document attached) (jpp) (Entered: 05/31/2022) | |
| 05/31/22 | Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Middle; Case Number 1:22-cv-00566. Original file received electronically (Entered: 05/31/2022) | |
| 05/31/22 | ORDER granting 5 Motion to Transfer. This case is transferred to the Southern District of California. Signed by Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson on 5/31/2022 (ve) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/31/2022.] (Entered: 05/31/2022) | |
| 05/31/22 | Initial Civil Docket 05-31-2022 | |
| 08/02/21 | REPORT of Patent and Trademark Closing, regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) 8,828,665, 10,203,345, re 11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. cc:USPTO (rmc) (Entered: 08/02/2021) | |
| 11/21/19 | CLERKS JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff on Plaintiffs Claim 1 (ECF No. 1), declaring the patent in suit, U.S. Patent No. 8,419,505, invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), pursuant to the Courts ruling on Summary Judgment. The Court therefore dismisses as moot Plaintiffs Claim II and Defendants First Counterclaim, because without a valid patent there can be no infringement. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant on Plaintiffs First and Second Counter Counterclaims regarding false advertising under the Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. §1125(a) and California Unfair Competition Law, California Business and Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq., pursuant to the Courts ruling on Summary Judgment. Defendants Second through Sixth Counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice, with each side to bear their own fees and costs with respect to these counterclaims.(jpp) (Entered: 11/21/2019) | |
| 11/21/19 | ORDER granting 172 Joint Motion for Judgment to (1) Enter judgment of invalidity on the patent claims, (3) Enter judgment dismissing Plaintiffs unfair competition Counter Claims, (3) Dismiss Defendants second through sixth Counterclaims, and (4) Close the case. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/21/2019. (jpp) (Entered: 11/21/2019) | |
| 11/20/19 | Joint MOTION for Judgment (1) Enter Judgment of Invalidity on the Patent Claims, (2) Enter Judgment Dismissing Plaintiffs Unfair Competition Counter-Counterclaims, (3) Dismiss Counterclaims 2 Through 6, and (4) Close the Case by American Fireglass. (Samouris, Phillip) (jpp). (Entered: 11/20/2019) | |
| 01/22/19 | ORDER Granting 120 134 Motions to Seal Documents. Defendant states that the documents are for "attorneys eyes only" pursuant to the Protective Order in place in this case. Good cause appearing, the Court grants Defendants Motions. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/22/2019. (rmc) (Entered: 01/22/2019) |