King & Schickli PLLC

Washington

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases2

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Semicond., OpticMech Eng, ManufCommunications

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/11/25	Cywee Group Ltd v. HTC Corp 2:17-CV-00932 ( W.D. WA )	PROVISIONALLY SEALED ORDER granting HTC's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # [193] ). The court DENIES CyWee Motion Group's motion to amend (Dkt. # [194] ); and DISMISSES CyWee Motion Group's cross-counterclaims. The parties are ORDERED to show cause, by no later than 2/25/2025, why the court should not dismiss CyWee Group's patent infringement claims and HTC's invalidity counterclaims in light of the results of inter partes review. The parties may satisfy this order by filing a stipulated motion to dismiss that is signed by counsel for both parties. The court ORDERS the parties to (1) meet and confer regarding the need for redaction and (2) file, by no later than 2/25/2025, a joint statement indicating whether and how this order should be redacted. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TE)(cc: counsel via USPS email) Modified on 2/11/2025 (TE). (Entered: 02/11/2025) PROVISIONALLY SEALED ORDER granting HTC's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # [193] ). The court DENIES CyWee Motion Group's motion to amend (Dkt. # [194] ); and DISMISSES CyWee Motion Group's cross-counterclaims. The parties are ORDERED to show cause, by no later than 2/25/2025, why the court should not dismiss CyWee Group's patent infringement claims and HTC's invalidity counterclaims in light of the results of inter partes review. The parties may satisfy this order by filing a stipulated motion to dismiss that is signed by counsel for both parties. The court ORDERS the parties to (1) meet and confer regarding the need for redaction and (2) file, by no later than 2/25/2025, a joint statement indicating whether and how this order should be redacted. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TE)(cc: counsel via USPS email) Modified on 2/11/2025 (TE). (Entered: 02/11/2025)