Legal Office Of David J Johnson

New York

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases40

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Transport., E-Comm.Comp. Arch. and SoftwareCommunications

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/22/24	Ak Meeting IP LLC v. Epic Games Inc 1:23-CV-08214 ( S.D. NY )	REPORT & RECOMMENDATION re: 27 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Epic Games, Inc. Because Plaintiff has not plausibly alleged that Defendant's products infringe, the Motion to Dismiss should be GRANTED and the Amended Complaint dismissed with prejudice. V. FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Such objections, and any responses to objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court and on ECF. Any requests for an extension of time for filing objections must be directed to Judge Woods. Failure to file objections within fourteen days will result in a waiver of objections and will preclude appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir. 2003). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close Dkt. No. 27. SO ORDERED. (Objections to R&R due by 9/4/2024.) Motions terminated: 27 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Epic Games, Inc. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis on 8/21/2024) (mml) (Entered: 08/22/2024) REPORT & RECOMMENDATION re: 27 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Epic Games, Inc. Because Plaintiff has not plausibly alleged that Defendant's products infringe, the Motion to Dismiss should be GRANTED and the Amended Complaint dismissed with prejudice. V. FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Such objections, and any responses to objections shall be filed with the Clerk of Court and on ECF. Any requests for an extension of time for filing objections must be directed to Judge Woods. Failure to file objections within fourteen days will result in a waiver of objections and will preclude appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Cephas v. Nash, 328 F.3d 98, 107 (2d Cir. 2003). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close Dkt. No. 27. SO ORDERED. (Objections to R&R due by 9/4/2024.) Motions terminated: 27 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Epic Games, Inc. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer E. Willis on 8/21/2024) (mml) (Entered: 08/22/2024)
07/14/24	Linfo IP LLC v. Trustpilot Inc 1:24-CV-02796 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER granting 18 Motion for Aashish Kapadia to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jesse M. Furman)(Text Only Order) (Furman, Jesse) (Entered: 07/14/2024)
07/14/24	Linfo IP LLC v. Trustpilot Inc 1:24-CV-02796 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER granting 17 Motion for Kevin Meek to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jesse M. Furman)(Text Only Order) (Furman, Jesse) (Entered: 07/14/2024)
07/10/24	Linfo IP LLC v. American Exchange Apparel Group Corp 1:24-CV-02952 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER granting 19 Letter Motion for Extension of Time: Granted. Defendant shall move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before August 14, 2024. So ordered. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge J. Paul Oetken)(Text Only Order) (sc) (Entered: 07/10/2024)
07/10/24	Linfo IP LLC v. American Exchange Apparel Group Corp 1:24-CV-02952 ( S.D. NY )	CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: 1 Complaint up to and including August 14, 2024 addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Serge Krimnus dated July 10, 2024. Document filed by Aero Global, LLC..(Krimnus, Serge) (Entered: 07/10/2024)
07/10/24	Linfo IP LLC v. American Exchange Apparel Group Corp 1:24-CV-02952 ( S.D. NY )	NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ariel Reinitz on behalf of Aero Global, LLC..(Reinitz, Ariel) (Entered: 07/10/2024)
07/09/24	Mcom IP LLC v. Valley National Bank 1:24-CV-04568 ( S.D. NY )	CASE DECLINED AS NOT RELATED. Case referred as related to 1:23-cv-08832-MMG. and declined by Judge Margaret M. Garnett and returned to wheel for assignment. (vba) (Entered: 07/09/2024)
07/09/24	Mcom IP LLC v. Valley National Bank 1:24-CV-04568 ( S.D. NY )	Magistrate Judge Gary Stein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) (Entered: 07/09/2024) Magistrate Judge Gary Stein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) (Entered: 07/09/2024)
07/09/24	Mcom IP LLC v. Valley National Bank 1:24-CV-04568 ( S.D. NY )	NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) (Entered: 07/09/2024)
06/21/24	Riggs Technology Holdings LLC v. Relias Learning LLC 1:21-CV-06229 ( S.D. NY )	REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 43 MOTION for Attorney Fees . filed by Relias Learning LLC. For the reasons set forth above, I conclude that Defendant is the prevailing party but that this is not an exceptional case given the totality of the circumstances. Accordingly, I respectfully recommend that Defendant's application for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 be DENIED. (Objections to R&R due by 7/8/2024) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky on 6/21/24) (yv) (Entered: 06/21/2024) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 43 MOTION for Attorney Fees . filed by Relias Learning LLC. For the reasons set forth above, I conclude that Defendant is the prevailing party but that this is not an exceptional case given the totality of the circumstances. Accordingly, I respectfully recommend that Defendant's application for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 be DENIED. (Objections to R&R due by 7/8/2024) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky on 6/21/24) (yv) (Entered: 06/21/2024)