Shelton Coburn LLP
General
Cases39
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
Comp. Arch. and SoftwareSoftware, SecurityCommunications
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
02/06/25 | DISCOVERY ORDER re [28] Motion for Entry of Discovery Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/5/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 02/06/2025) | |
02/06/25 | DOCKET CONTROL ORDER re [27] JOINT MOTION for Entry of Docket Control Order filed by Stingray IP Solutions LLC., Pretrial Conference set for 6/1/2026 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne., Jury Selection set for 7/6/2026 at 09:00AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap., Markman Hearing set for 1/16/2026 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (Motion(s) [27] terminated). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/5/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 02/06/2025) | |
02/06/25 | ORDER granting [26] UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [23] OPPOSED MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Under 35 U.S.C. Section 101 Responses due by 2/24/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/5/2025. (NKL) (Entered: 02/06/2025) | |
12/18/24 | Text Order MOOTING [77] Motion for Protective Order entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Before the Court is non-party Opus IVS, Inc.'s ("Opus IVS") Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 77), in which Opus IVS asks this Court to prohibit Defendant from seeking certain testimony that is the subject of Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery from Non-Party Opus IVS (ECF No. 88). Given that the Court denied Defendant's Motion to Compel ( see ECF No. 304 at 3), the Court determines that Opus IVS' Motion for Protective Order is MOOT. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (pwlc) (Entered: 12/18/2024) | |
10/04/24 | ORDER GRANTING [15] Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney L. Kieran Kieckhefer for NVIDIA Corporation. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (jb3) (Entered: 10/04/2024) | |
10/04/24 | RESET Deadlines: NVIDIA Corporation answer due 11/21/2024. (jb3) (Entered: 10/04/2024) | |
10/04/24 | Text Order GRANTING [16] Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended up to and including November 21, 2024. Entered by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (DTG) (Entered: 10/04/2024) | |
08/26/24 | ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S REQUESTED DISCOVERY RELIEF. Signed by Judge Derek T. Gilliland. (pg) (Entered: 08/26/2024) | |
08/15/24 | Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.(Shelton, Barry) (Entered: 08/15/2024) | |
08/15/24 | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Barry Kenneth Shelton on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Shelton, Barry) (Entered: 08/15/2024) |