Tiajoloff & Kelly LLP
General
Cases17
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
DesignTransport., E-Comm.Semicond., Optic
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
01/22/25 | MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis on 1/22/25.(ca, ) (Entered: 01/22/2025) | |
01/22/25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion and order, the Court grants plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on infringement as to direct infringement by defendants Campbell, Kroger, and Meijer [448] , [450] . Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment of non-infringement is denied [438] . Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment regarding prior art and patent invalidity is also denied [443] , [445] . The Court grants the parties' motions to seal [452] , [454] . The Court sets an in-person status hearing on 2/11/2025 at 10:00 a.m. to discuss next steps in this matter. (ca, ) (Entered: 01/22/2025) | |
01/14/22 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order) (lom) (Entered: 01/14/2022) | |
01/14/22 | ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 63 by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. It is so ordered that this entire action, including all claims, counterclaims and defenses stated therein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own respective attorney's fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) (Entered: 01/14/2022) | |
01/14/22 | ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 42 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action, including all claims, counterclaims and defenses stated therein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own respective attorney's fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 01/14/2022) | |
05/17/21 | Final Civil Docket 01-14-2022 | |
08/19/21 | ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT -. Case transferred from Texas Eastern has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:21-cv-06640, filed 08/17/2021. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/19/2021) | |
08/19/21 | Interdistrict transfer to the Central District of California 2:21-cv-06640. (ch, ) (Entered: 08/19/2021) | |
05/17/21 | Final Civil Docket 08-19-2021 | |
02/07/19 | ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Pursuant to Rule 41(a) Fed. Rules Civ P., this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Application granted 7 .SO Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 2/6/2019. (Tavarez, Jennifer) (Entered: 02/07/2019) |