Kemet Law Group
General
Practice Areas
Design
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
02/05/25 | PRELIMINARY Injunction Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/5/2025. Mailed notice(lk, ) (Entered: 02/05/2025) | |
02/05/25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 2/5/2025. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [19] is granted. Order to follow. Status hearing set for 3/5/2025 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 02/05/2025) | |
02/05/25 | NOTICE of Correction regarding Copyright Report [25] (ksr, ) (Entered: 02/05/2025) | |
02/05/25 | ENTERED IN ERROR Modified on 2/5/2025 (ksr, ). (Entered: 02/05/2025) | |
11/20/24 | Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 11/20/2024. Emailed notice(rj, ) (Entered: 11/20/2024) | |
11/15/24 | MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (daj, ) (Entered: 11/15/2024) | |
07/17/24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 3 is granted. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of over 130 defendants in this case. See, e.g. Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D.Ill. 2020). By 8/7/24, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Status hearing set for 9/23/24 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice (cc, ) (Entered: 07/17/2024) |